Mental Health

How "greening" urban areas could improve our mental health

People relax in the sunshine at Green Park in London, Britain July 1, 2018. REUTERS/Henry Nicholls

Stanford scientists even believe a 90 minute walk in the woods can lower risk of depression. Image: REUTERS/Henry Nicholls

Kristin Hunt
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Mental Health?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Mental Health is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Mental Health

You might’ve noticed that you feel calmer, even happier, when you’re walking through a lush park or forest. This is no coincidence — spending time in nature has been linked to multiple mental health benefits, including stress relief and a better sense of well-being. Stanford scientists even believe a 90 minute walk in the woods can lead to a lower risk of depression.

Now, a new study suggests that “greening” abandoned lots in urban areas could improve the mental health of city dwellers.

The research, recently published in JAMA Open Network, was conducted in a cluster of Philadelphia communities, all located near a vacant lot. At the start of the study, these lots were littered with trash and overgrown grass. But not all of them would stay that way.

Image: FLICKR/XIQUINHOSILVA

With the help of the Pennsylvania Horticultural Society LandCare program, the researchers gave some of these lots a “greening intervention,” enlisting a crew of workers to clear out the garbage, plant new grass and trees, and perform maintenance each month. Other lots were limited to a trash cleanup. And some were left completely untouched.

 Distribution of Study Vacant Lots Across Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Image: JAMA Network

Before any of this greening or cleaning began, the research team of doctors and health experts interviewed people who lived near the lots. They looked for signs of poor mental health, asking the residents how often they felt nervous, depressed, restless, hopeless, or worthless. Then they checked back in with them after the “interventions” — greening, trash cleanup, or none — to see if the local lots had any impact on their well-being.

It turns out, they did. Those who lived near the newly “greened” vacant lots saw a 41.5 percent decrease in feelings of depression and an overall 62.8 percent drop in self-reported poor mental health, compared to those who lived near lots that stayed the same.

“What these new data show us is that making structural changes, like greening lots, has a positive impact on the health of those living in these neighborhoods,” says Eugenia C. South, lead author and assistant professor at the University of Pennsylvania, in a statement. “And that it can be achieved in a cost-effective and scalable way — not only in Philadelphia but in other cities with the same harmful environmental surroundings.”

The change was particularly dramatic for neighborhoods living below the poverty line. Residents in these areas who saw a “greening intervention” reported a 68.7 percent dip in feelings of depression.

Image: FLICKR/SHAWN TAYLOR

But interestingly, researchers found little difference in the self-reported mental health between the trash clean-up intervention group and no intervention group.

“The lack of change in these groups is likely because the trash clean-up lots had no additional green space created,” John MacDonald, co-author and University of Pennsylvania professor, explains in the statement. “The findings support that exposure to more natural environments can be part of restoring mental health, particularly for people living in stressful and chaotic urban environments.”

The same research team has previously studied the link between crime and urban green spaces, finding a 29 percent drop in gun violence near newly treated vacant lots.

The study further claims that abandoned lots can be converted into green spaces for as little as $1,597, with an additional $180 a year in maintenance fees. Which is why the researchers are hoping government policy makers will transform their findings into action, greening the estimated 40,000 vacant lots in Philadelphia and abandoned land in other cities.

Have you read?
Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Mental HealthFuture of the Environment
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

From 'Quit-Tok' to proximity bias, here are 11 buzzwords from the world of hybrid work

Kate Whiting

April 17, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum